Joshua's "Sun Stood Still" at Gibeon
Too thin a record to say either way.
The account
In Joshua 10:12-14, Joshua commands the sun to stand still over Gibeon and the moon over the Valley of Aijalon so Israel can finish a battle, and "the sun stayed in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day." Read literally, it is a suspension of celestial motion with no natural account. Read poetically or idiomatically — the text itself quotes the lost poetic "Book of Jashar" — it may be elevated battle language. A 2017 Cambridge study (Humphreys & Waddington) argues the Hebrew describes the sun and moon "stopping shining," i.e., an annular solar eclipse on 30 October 1207 BC, which would be the oldest datable eclipse and help fix the reign of Ramesses II. Other Hebraists reject the eclipse reading on linguistic, calendrical, and physical grounds. The honest verdict: an intriguing, datable eclipse hypothesis alongside an unverifiable literal long-day — genuinely contested.
Read the full account →Collapse the account ↑
In Joshua 10:12-14, Joshua commands the sun to stand still over Gibeon and the moon over the Valley of Aijalon so Israel can finish a battle, and "the sun stayed in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day." The narrator adds that "there has been no day like it before or since," framing the day as one on which the LORD fought for Israel. The events are set in the Late Bronze Age, traditionally during the Israelite settlement of Canaan, at Gibeon and the Valley of Aijalon in Canaan (modern central Israel / West Bank).
The passage itself quotes an older source. The text cites the "Book of Jashar," a lost collection of Israelite poetry, and verses 12b-13a fall into Hebrew poetic parallelism that pairs sun with Gibeon and moon with Aijalon. Many evangelical and Jewish commentators read these lines as a victory poem using cosmic, hyperbolic imagery — a way of describing a day long enough for Israel to win — rather than as a meteorological record. Don Stewart's survey for Blue Letter Bible reviews the literal long-day, poetic/figurative, and local-light/refraction readings, notes the Book of Jashar citation and the genre ambiguity, and counsels suspending dogmatic judgment.
In 2017, Cambridge physicist Colin Humphreys and astrophysicist Graeme Waddington published a study in Astronomy & Geophysics (Vol 58, Issue 5, pp. 5.39-5.42; DOI 10.1093/astrogeo/atx178) reviving an earlier philological suggestion. They argue that the Hebrew verbs dom and 'amad can mean that the sun and moon "stopped shining" rather than stopped moving. Running eclipse calculations that account for Earth's variable rotation, they identify the only annular solar eclipse visible over Canaan between 1500 and 1050 BC as occurring on the afternoon of 30 October 1207 BC, with about 86% of the sun's disk covered. They describe this as the oldest datable solar eclipse in human record. Cross-referenced with the Merneptah Stele's mention of "Israel" in Canaan, they say it tightens the chronology of Egypt's New Kingdom, placing the reign of Ramesses the Great (Ramesses II) at roughly 1276-1210 BC, ±1 year. The University of Cambridge press release and an independent report by Sci-News.com both lay out these specifics: the single annular eclipse over Canaan in that window, the afternoon of 30 October 1207 BC, and the resulting Ramesses II dating of 1276-1210 BC.
Other Hebraists dispute the eclipse reading. In a 2022 article in Culture and Cosmos, Marinus Anthony van der Sluijs and Peter G. van der Veen argue that the interpretation fails on calendrical, philological, and physical grounds. They hold that dom and 'amad most naturally mean "be still/stop," not "go dark" or "grow dark." They also note that the text depicts the sun as still visible "in the midst of heaven," which a solar eclipse does not produce, since an eclipse darkens rather than prolongs daylight.
The Book of Joshua is the only narrative source for the episode, drawing on a poem now lost, with no external or astronomical corroboration that any specific celestial event occurred at this battle.
Reviewer Notes
We weigh a claim on two things, kept separate from the story above.
Assessed by Miracles Jar AI
An eclipse reading is intriguing and uniquely datable (30 Oct 1207 BC); the literal long-day is unverifiable. Genuinely contested — naturally possible under more than one reading, but extraordinary if taken literally.
An eclipse reading is intriguing and uniquely datable (30 Oct 1207 BC); the literal long-day is unverifiable. Genuinely contested — naturally possible under more than one reading, but extraordinary if taken literally.
The traditional or literal reading describes the sun and moon ceasing their motion across the sky — a halting of the natural celestial order — and the question is whether nature could explain it. Two of the leading readings (the poetic/idiomatic and the annular-eclipse interpretations) would not involve any suspension of nature at all; under those readings the account is fully lawful.
An annular solar eclipse passed over Canaan on the afternoon of 30 October 1207 BC — the only one in the 1500–1050 BC window — astronomically datable and falsifiable. Humphreys and Waddington's eclipse calculation accounts for Earth's variable rotation and is corroborated in Cambridge and Sci-News reports; it provides a fully natural candidate.
The passage cites the lost poetic "Book of Jashar," and verses 12b–13a show clear Hebrew poetic parallelism — a strong internal signal that the genre is elevated victory poetry, under which no literal suspension of nature need be asserted.
The Hebrew verbs dom and 'amad can plausibly mean "stop/cease" rather than "stop moving" — the linguistic hinge of the eclipse reading — though this is genuinely contested and cuts both ways.
The text says the sun stayed "in the midst of heaven" and was visible, which a solar eclipse does not produce — a physical objection to the eclipse reading, and a tension for the literal reading as well.
The only narrative source is the Book of Joshua itself, quoting an older verse, with no external or astronomical corroboration; this limits historical verifiability in either direction.
Taken literally (Earth's rotation halting for roughly twenty-four hours), no known natural mechanism applies and the effect would be globally catastrophic, yet it leaves no geological or independent record — the literal reading resists naturalism by definition, but its lack of physical trace makes it historically unverifiable rather than confirmable as miraculous.
The honest verdict is genuine uncertainty: there is a real, datable eclipse that could plausibly stand behind the text; there is a defensible poetic reading under which nothing supernatural in nature is claimed; and there is the literal reading, which would be a true miracle but cannot be verified by the tools of history or astronomy.
Evidence ledger — what the verdict rests on
A real annular solar eclipse did pass over Canaan on the afternoon of 30 October 1207 BC — the only one in the window 1500-1050 BC — making it astronomically datable and falsifiable.
Humphreys & Waddington's eclipse code, accounting for Earth's variable rotation; corroborated in Cambridge and Sci-News reports. Provides a fully natural candidate for the event.
The passage explicitly cites the lost poetic 'Book of Jashar,' and verses 12b-13a are in clear Hebrew poetic parallelism.
Strong internal signal that the genre is elevated victory poetry, under which no literal suspension of nature need be asserted.
The Hebrew verbs dom and 'amad can plausibly mean 'stop/cease' rather than 'stop moving' — the linguistic hinge of the eclipse reading.
Genuinely contested. Humphreys and Waddington read 'stop shining'; van der Sluijs & van der Veen argue the natural sense is 'be still,' not 'grow dark.' Cuts both ways.
The text says the sun stayed 'in the midst of heaven' and was visible — which a solar eclipse does not produce (an eclipse darkens, not prolongs, daylight).
A physical objection to the eclipse reading raised by critics; also tension for the literal reading. Pushes against the eclipse hypothesis specifically, not toward the supernatural.
The only narrative source is the Book of Joshua itself, with no external or astronomical corroboration that any specific celestial event occurred at this battle.
Single ancient witness quoting older verse; limits historical verifiability in either direction.
Taken literally (Earth's rotation halting ~24 hours), there is no known natural mechanism and the effect would be globally catastrophic, yet leaves no geological or independent record.
The literal reading resists naturalism by definition, but its very lack of physical trace makes it historically unverifiable rather than confirmable as miraculous.
What would raise this score: Instrumented or physical evidence — measurements, samples, footage that survives analysis — would raise this.
What would lower it: A controlled observation reproducing the experience naturally (lighting, suggestion, pareidolia) would move it down.
How this works
We keep two questions apart on purpose — so a thin record can’t make an impossible thing look proven, and a strong record can’t dress up an ordinary one as a miracle. First: Could nature explain it? (taking the account as true for the moment.) The question is whether nature could produce this at all — assuming, for the moment, the events are true as described. Second: is there real evidence it happened? A claim only stands out when both hold up — and we never call anything certain either way. How ratings work →
The natural explanation
The leading natural account for this case is misperception: how honest witnesses get it wrong. Read what it explains — and where it stops.
Sources
Tagged by proximity to the event. Primary sources are direct or contemporaneous; tertiary are downstream retellings.
- 1.Primaryacademic
Official Cambridge press release on the Humphreys & Waddington study; states the 30 Oct 1207 BC annular eclipse claim, the Hebrew 'stopped shining' argument, and the Merneptah/Ramesses II dating consequence.
- 2.Primaryacademic
Peer-reviewed primary article. Vol 58, Issue 5, pp. 5.39-5.42. DOI 10.1093/astrogeo/atx178. Argues dom/'amad mean cessation of shining; identifies only annular eclipse over Canaan 1500-1050 BC as 30 Oct 1207 BC, 86% coverage.
- 3.Secondarywebsite
Don Stewart, "Did the Sun Actually Stand Still in Joshua's Long Day?", Blue Letter Bible, n.d.
Surveys the literal long-day, poetic/figurative, and local-light/refraction readings; notes the Book of Jashar citation and genre ambiguity; counsels suspending dogmatic judgment.
- 4.Secondaryacademic
Scholarly rebuttal arguing the eclipse interpretation is unacceptable on calendrical, philological, and physical grounds; dom/'amad mean 'be still/stop,' not 'grow dark.'
- 5.Secondarynews
Independent science-news report corroborating the study's specifics: only annular eclipse over Canaan 1500-1050 BC, afternoon of 30 Oct 1207 BC; notes the resulting Ramesses II dating of 1276-1210 BC.
Cases like this
Nearest on the map — similar in how miraculous they’d be, and how strong the evidence is.